@martin Isn't Mozilla providing a ready Docker image on Docker Hub? I'm using an image by crazymax for a longer time now.

@jlelse there is an image @ called /syncserver, but that is inofficial. not sure who built it and what's in it...
basically, everyone could create an account with the name "mozilla" :)

and i'd never use an image by some unknown (like crazymax) for such information... who knows what's in the image? and what's in there next week?

@martin @jlelse

What's in it now? As it's not an automated build (and the Dockerfile is unknown), you have to vet this using the tools out there.

What's in it next week? You don't have to worry about this when using an image version SHA. Never use latest!

But yes, it mostly sucks. Better roll your own image.

@sendung @martin Sure, paranoia level isn't limited 😅
I used the other image (source code here: https://github.com/crazy-max/docker-firefox-syncserver) mainly because I think the official repo just got a good dockerfile recently. Back when I was setting things up the mozilla dockerfile was still based on Debian I think (huge image size).
I agree that it may be safer to build own images, but it can also have the disadvantage of an unfixed system.

@sendung @jlelse
hehe, ! :angry_trump:
hard to know what you get in the end, as usual. different levels of

i for sure wouldn't trust the image of crazymax, unless he's a good friend. i've seen many popular accs being sold or ..
if would be an official acc at , i'd probably also have sufficient in that image.

but... most trustworthy is the sources and a from mozilla's repo. so i need to (automatically) build the image myself

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!